No. 521 | SCOTUS | Mar 28, 1932

Per Curiam:

The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. Glenn v. Doyal, ante, p. 526; Moffitt v. Kelly, 218 U.S. 400" court="SCOTUS" date_filed="1910-11-28" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/moffitt-v-kelly-97307?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="97307">218 U. S. 400, 404, 405; Nickel v. Cole, 256 U.S. 222" court="SCOTUS" date_filed="1921-04-25" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/nickel-v-cole-99794?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="99794">256 U. S. 222, 226; Castillo v. McConnico, 168 U.S. 674" court="SCOTUS" date_filed="1898-01-03" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/castillo-v-mcconnico-94793?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="94793">168 U. S. 674, 683; Lombard v. West Chicago Park Comm’rs, 181 U.S. 33" court="SCOTUS" date_filed="1901-04-08" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/lombard-v-west-chicago-park-commissioners-95442?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="95442">181 U. S. 33, 42, 43; Rawlins v. Georgia, 201 U.S. 638" court="SCOTUS" date_filed="1906-04-16" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/rawlins-v-georgia-96456?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="96456">201 U. S. 638, 639, 640; Hebert v. Louisiana, 272 U.S. 312" court="SCOTUS" date_filed="1926-11-01" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/hebert-v-louisiana-100929?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="100929">272 U. S. 312, *529316, 317.

Mr. Powell C. Groner, with whom Messrs. Robert W. Otto and Henry N. Ess were on the brief, for appellant. ' Messrs. Henry L. McCune and E. H. Wright were on the brief for appellee.
© 2024 Midpage AI does not provide legal advice. By using midpage, you consent to our Terms and Conditions.