History
  • No items yet
midpage
Kamber v. Rosen
98 N.Y.S. 839
N.Y. App. Term.
1906
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

We do not think that the guaranty ever became effective, because it was never accepted by plaintiff. The original guaranty was returned for the addition of a clause. Up to this time if certainly had not been accepted, and the guarantors had a right to recall it. This they unmistakably did. We do not consider that the minds of the parties ever met on the subject. Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event.

Case Details

Case Name: Kamber v. Rosen
Court Name: Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Date Published: Feb 27, 1906
Citation: 98 N.Y.S. 839
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Term.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.