History
  • No items yet
midpage
Kalkes v. Storms
93 Mich. 480
Mich.
1892
Check Treatment
McGrath, C. J.

This is ejectment, brought to recover possession of premises occupied by defendant and his wife for some years as a homestead. The wife was not joined as a defendant. For this and other reasons, which it is not necessary to discuss, the trial judge directed a verdict for defendant.

The case is ruled by Hodson v. Van Fossen, 26 Mich. 68; Henry v. Gregory, 29 Id. 68; Rowe v. Kellogg, 54 Id. 206; Cleaver v. Bigelow, 61 Id. 47; Haddy v. Tobias, 85 Id. 326, — and the judgment is affirmed.

The ‘other Justices concurred.

Case Details

Case Name: Kalkes v. Storms
Court Name: Michigan Supreme Court
Date Published: Nov 18, 1892
Citation: 93 Mich. 480
Court Abbreviation: Mich.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.