History
  • No items yet
midpage
Kalish v. Krieger
35 N.Y.2d 864
NY
1974
Check Treatment

*865Memorandum. In the ease of these as with most jury instructions, additional reflection might suggest reorganization, slightly different emphases, and more precise phrasing. We find here, however, neither errors of substance nor significant confusion between those portions of the instructions relating to contributory negligence and those relating to proximate causation.

Accordingly, the order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler and Babin concur; Judge Stevens taking no part.

Order affirmed, with costs, in memorandum.

Case Details

Case Name: Kalish v. Krieger
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Dec 18, 1974
Citation: 35 N.Y.2d 864
Court Abbreviation: NY
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.