Kajo v. E. W. Howell Co., Inc.Kajo v. E. W. Howell Co., Inc.
Ordered that the order dated February 7, 2012, is affirmed, with costs.
The Supreme Court properly denied the plaintiffs’ motion for leave to renew. In support of their motion, the plaintiffs failed to establish that the decision in Runner v New York Stock Exch., Inc. (13 NY3d 599 [2009]) created a change in the law that would alter the prior determination in this matter (see
The parties’ remaining contentions are without merit. Mastro, J.P., Balkin, Miller and LaSalle, JJ., concur.