History
  • No items yet
midpage
Kaiser v. Flaccus
138 Pa. 332
Pa.
1890
Check Treatment
Pee Curiam :

The first assignment of error was practically abandoned npon the argument, and we fail to find error in the answer of the learned judge to the defendant’s tenth point. It is true, the affirmance was qualified, but we think the qualification justified by the circumstances of the case. It does not need discussion.

Judgment affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Kaiser v. Flaccus
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Nov 10, 1890
Citation: 138 Pa. 332
Docket Number: No. 123
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.