midpage

K & S Diversified Investments, Inc. v. ChengK & S Diversified Investments, Inc. v. Cheng

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Dec 23, 2005
No. 04-55741
Versions:

MEMORANDUM *

As the parties are familiar with the facts and the procedural history of the case, we go at once to the dispositive issue. The Chengs acted as debtors when they filed the Lien Motion to protect their homestead exemption. The Chengs acted as debtors-in-possession when they filed an Objection to the K & S claim. As they acted in a different capacity they were not estopped by representations made as debtors. Moreover, it would be inequitable to allow K & S to assert its increased claim without the Chengs having opportunity to challenge it. Consequently, the judgment of the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel is AFFIRMED, and, in accordance with the judgment, the case is REMANDED to the Bankruptcy Court.

Notes

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Case Details

Case Name: K & S Diversified Investments, Inc. v. Cheng
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Date Published: Dec 23, 2005
Citations: 160 F. App'x 644; No. 04-55741
Docket Number: No. 04-55741
Court Abbreviation: 9th Cir.
Log In
    K & S Diversified Investments, Inc. v. Cheng, 160 F. App'x 644