History
  • No items yet
midpage
JW v. State
667 So. 2d 207
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
1995
Check Treatment
667 So. 2d 207 (1995)

J.W., a Child, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 95-382.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 26, 1995.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Kathleen Stover, Asst. Public Defender, Tallahassee, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Edward C. Hill, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

No recording of the trial in this case is available because of a malfunction in the recording equipment. The trial court has entered an order finding that the parties are unable to agree on the events at trial and certifies that the record cannot be reconstructed. Appellant moves to vacate his conviction. The state concedes that remand for a new trial is the appropriate remedy.

The granting of a new trial is the proper remedy when an adequate record cannot be prepared. Delap v. State, 350 So. 2d 462 (Fla. 1977). This principle has been deemed applicable to juvenile cases. M.R.G. v. State, 576 So. 2d 1378 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991). Accordingly, we REVERSE and REMAND for a new trial.

ERVIN, JOANOS and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: JW v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Jul 26, 1995
Citation: 667 So. 2d 207
Docket Number: 95-382
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.