History
  • No items yet
midpage
Julias A. Nasso & Associates Concrete Corp. v. Trataros Construction, Inc.
911 N.Y.S.2d 623
N.Y. App. Div.
2010
Check Treatment

JULIAS A. NASSO & ASSOCIATES CONCRETE CORP., Respondent, v TRATAROS CONSTRUCTION, INC., et al., Appellants.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

911 N.Y.S.2d 623

Charles E. Ramos, J.

JULIAS A. NASSO & ASSOCIATES CONCRETE CORP., Respondent, v TRATAROS CONSTRUCTION, INC., et al., Appellants. [911 NYS2d 623] — Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles E. Ramos, J.), entered December 3, 2009, which, in an action alleging breach of contract, denied defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The motion court properly determined that plaintiff‘s breach of contract claims were not time-barred. According to the complaint, payment for the work plaintiff performed under the subcontract with defendants was conditioned upon the processing and disposition of payment claims with the owner of the construction project. The breach of contract claims therefore did not accrue until 2006, when the payment claims were finally processed and defendants failed to pay the liquidated amounts, and not, as defendants contend, when plaintiff initially completed the work (see

John J. Kassner & Co. v City of New York, 46 NY2d 544, 550 [1979]).

We have considered defendants’ remaining arguments and find them unavailing. Concur—Tom, J.P., Andrias, Sweeny, DeGrasse and Román, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: Julias A. Nasso & Associates Concrete Corp. v. Trataros Construction, Inc.
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Dec 7, 2010
Citation: 911 N.Y.S.2d 623
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.