History
  • No items yet
midpage
Juhel v. Rhinelander
2 Johns. Cas. 120
N.Y. Sup. Ct.
1800
Check Treatment
The Court (Benson, J

dissenting) said, that they considered the decision, in the case of Seton, Maitland & Co. v. Low, as conclusive, and that the plaintiff' was entitled to judgment accordingly. r

Judgment for the plaintiff.(b)

(b) Affirmed in the court of errors, in 1802, infra, 487.

Case Details

Case Name: Juhel v. Rhinelander
Court Name: New York Supreme Court
Date Published: Oct 15, 1800
Citation: 2 Johns. Cas. 120
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. Sup. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.