Juhel v. Rhinelander
2 Johns. Cas. 120 | N.Y. Sup. Ct. | 1800
dissenting) said, that they considered the decision, in the case of Seton, Maitland & Co. v. Low, as conclusive, and that the plaintiff' was entitled to judgment accordingly. r
Judgment for the plaintiff.(
(b) Affirmed in the court of errors, in 1802, infra, 487.