18 Wash. 269 | Wash. | 1897
The opinion of the court was delivered by
This action was brought to foreclose laborers’ liens on a quantity of shingles, and, the liens being sustained, the intervenors have appealed. The sole question to be determined is whether the shingles were at the mil] where they were manufactured, or under the control of the manufacturer, within the provisions of section 2, laws 1893, p. 428 (Bal. Code, § 5931). The evidence is not brought here, the contention being that the decree
Reversed and remanded accordingly.
Gordon, Dunbar and Reavis, JJ., concur.