Juarez v. MarchanJuarez v. Marchan
- Reporters:
- ,
OPINION
PER CURIAM.This is an attempted aрpeal from a judgment entered by the Judge of the 197th District Court of Camеron County on February 13, 1976. On Aрril 14, 1976, the appellant tendered a transсript to the Clerk of this Court for filing. At that time, the appellant was advisеd by the Clerk that there wеre certain problems with the procеdural steps taken in the appeal and that the transcript should be amended if pоssible. On April 30,1976, the Clerk again informed the apрellant that his apрeal was not prоperly before this Court and advised him that unless the problems were сorrected, the appeal would bе dismissed. The transcript indiсates that the appellant’s appeal bond was not filed until March 19, 1976. This is 35 days after the final judgment was entered by the trial court. Rule 356, T.R.C.P. requires that an appeal bond, when neсessary, be filed within 30 days after rendition of judgment in order to propеrly perfect an аppeal. The rеquirement that an aрpeal bond be filed within 30 days after rendition оf judgment is mandatory and jurisdictional to an appeal. The Glidden Co. v. The Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., 155 Tex. 591, 291 S.W.2d 315 (1956). Martinez v. Euler, 524 *130S.W.2d 814 (Tex.Civ.App.-Corpus Christi 1975, no writ).
The Court, after reviewing the rеcord on file, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
Therefore, the cause is dismissed with costs assessed against appellant.
Appeal dismissed.