JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, Respondent, v CHING J. LU, Also Known as CHING JUNG LU, Appellant, and 408 WEST 57TH OWNERS CORP., Respondent, et al., Defendant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
August 31, 2017
153 AD3d 551 | 64 NYS3d 542
The trial court’s determination that defendant failed to demonstrate a reasonable excuse for her default was within the court’s sound discretion (see Gecaj v Gjonaj Realty & Mgt. Corp., 149 AD3d 600, 602 [1st Dept 2017]). To the extent defendant denies service of the summons and complaint, her general denials are insufficient to rebut the presumption of service created by the detailed, validly executed affidavits of service (see Slimani v Citibank, N.A., 47 AD3d 489 [1st Dept 2008]). Defendant’s argument that she relied on assurance from defendant cooperative corporation (the co-op) that her property would be protected and that she need not answer the complaint, is unsupported by any proof and accordingly insufficient (see Buro Happold Consulting Engrs., PC. v RMJM, 107 AD3d 602 [1st Dept 2013]). Moreover, defendant, who acknowledged she did
Given the lack of a reasonable excuse for her default, it is not necessary for us to consider whether defendant demonstrated the existence of a meritorious defense (see Gecaj, 149 AD3d at 607). Concur—Richter, J.P., Kapnick, Webber, Oing and Singh, JJ.
