History
  • No items yet
midpage
Joyner v. ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM
147 S.E.2d 602
| N.C. | 1966
|
Check Treatment
147 S.E.2d 602 (1966)
267 N.C. 44

Charles W. JOYNER, Petitioner,
v.
ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF the CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM, Amos Speas, J. A. Hancock, Carl Dull, Jr., Roy Setzer, A. T. Harrington, C. C. Smithdeal and Douglas B. Elam, Respondents.

No. 458.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 13, 1966.

Harold R. Wilson, Edward R. Green, Winston-Salem, for petitioner appellant.

Womble, Carlyle, Sandridge & Rice, by W. F. Womble, Winston-Salem, for respondent appellees.

PER CURIAM:

This appeal presents the same legal questions decided this day in the companion case of Craver v. Zoning Board of Adjustment, 147 S.E.2d 599. The two cases were argued together by the same counsel. On the authority of that decision, the judgment is

Affirmed.

MOORE, J., not sitting.

Case Details

Case Name: Joyner v. ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM
Court Name: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date Published: Apr 13, 1966
Citation: 147 S.E.2d 602
Docket Number: 458
Court Abbreviation: N.C.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.