675, Docket 84-7515 | 2d Cir. | Feb 1, 1985

754 F.2d 109" date_filed="1985-02-01" court="2d Cir." case_name="Joyce L. CAMERON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES TRUST COMPANY OF NEW YORK, Defendant-Appellee">754 F.2d 109

37 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 254" date_filed="1985-02-01" court="2d Cir." case_name="Joyce L. CAMERON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES TRUST COMPANY OF NEW YORK, Defendant-Appellee">37 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 254,
36 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 34,986
Joyce L. CAMERON, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES TRUST COMPANY OF NEW YORK, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 675, Docket 84-7515.

United States Court of Appeals,
Second Circuit.

Argued Jan. 31, 1985.
Decided Feb. 1, 1985.

Jeffrey L. Liddle, New York City (David D. Howe, Liddle & O'Connor, New York City, on brief), for defendant-appellee.

Joyce L. Cameron, pro se.

Before NEWMAN, KEARSE and PRATT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

The sole issue on this appeal from a judgment of the District Court for the Southern District of New York (Abraham D. Sofaer, Judge), dismissing as time-barred a complaint under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. Sec. 2000e et seq. (1982), is whether a cause of action for wrongful discharge accrues on the date of the discharge or the date when post-employment severance payments ceased.

2

We agree with all of the other circuits that have considered the question that the cause of action accrues on the date of discharge. Shah v. Halliburton Co., 627 F.2d 1055" date_filed="1980-09-12" court="10th Cir." case_name="Pravin B. SHAH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HALLIBURTON COMPANY, D/B/A Halliburton Services, Defendant-Appellee">627 F.2d 1055, 1056-57 (10th Cir.1980); Krzyzewski v. Metropolitan Government, 584 F.2d 802" date_filed="1978-10-03" court="6th Cir." case_name="18 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. 175 v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville">584 F.2d 802, 804-06 (6th Cir.1978); Greene v. Carter Carburetor Co., 532 F.2d 125" date_filed="1976-04-02" court="8th Cir." case_name="Mary GREENE, Appellant, v. CARTER CARBURETOR CO., Appellee">532 F.2d 125, 126 (8th Cir.1976); cf. Bonham v. Dresser Industries, Inc., 569 F.2d 187" date_filed="1978-01-26" court="3rd Cir." case_name="Emra Joseph Bonham v. Dresser Industries, Inc., a Corporation">569 F.2d 187, 191 (3d Cir.1978) (cause of action for wrongful discharge under Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. Sec. 621 et seq. (1982)), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 821" date_filed="1978-10-02" court="SCOTUS" case_name="Easton v. United States">439 U.S. 821, 99 S. Ct. 87" date_filed="1978-10-02" court="SCOTUS" case_name="Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. United States">99 S. Ct. 87, 58 L. Ed. 2d 113 (1978). Appellant's administrative complaint was not filed within the pertinent 300-day period specified in 42 U.S.C. Sec. 2000e-5(e).

3

The judgment of the District Court is affirmed.

© 2024 Midpage AI does not provide legal advice. By using midpage, you consent to our Terms and Conditions.