History
  • No items yet
midpage
506 F. App'x 342
6th Cir.
2012

Joyce BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael HALE, et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 12-5617

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit

Nov. 20, 2012

342

BEFORE: McKEAGUE and GRIFFIN, Circuit Judges; and DLOTT, District Judge.*

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff Joyce Brown appeals the district court’s award of summary judgment to defendant law enforcement officers on her civil rights and tort claims stemming from two encounters in August and December 2009. Having duly considered the district court’s opinion and the record in light of the parties’ appellate briefing, we find that plaintiff has not raised any argument that is not fairly and properly addressed in the district court’s opinion. Although we review the district court’s ruling de novo, we find no error. Concluding that a separate opinion would be duplicative and unnecessary, we hereby AFFIRM the district court’s summary judgment ruling on the reasoning of its opinion.

Notes

*
Honorable Susan J. Dlott, Chief United States District Judge for the Southern District of Ohio, sitting by designation.

Case Details

Case Name: Joyce Brown v. Michael Hale
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Date Published: Nov 20, 2012
Citations: 506 F. App'x 342; 12-5617
Docket Number: 12-5617
Court Abbreviation: 6th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In
    Joyce Brown v. Michael Hale, 506 F. App'x 342