History
  • No items yet
midpage
Jost v. Jost
1990 Mo. App. LEXIS 1165
Mo. Ct. App.
1990
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

The husband appeals from the trial court’s denial of his motion to modify a separation agreement. We affirm.

An extended opinion would have no prec-edential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case Details

Case Name: Jost v. Jost
Court Name: Missouri Court of Appeals
Date Published: Aug 7, 1990
Citation: 1990 Mo. App. LEXIS 1165
Docket Number: No. 56985
Court Abbreviation: Mo. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.