Jost v. Jost
1990 Mo. App. LEXIS 1165
Mo. Ct. App.1990Check TreatmentThe husband appeals from the trial court’s denial of his motion to modify a separation agreement. We affirm.
An extended opinion would have no prec-edential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).