midpage

Joseph v. StateJoseph v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida
Nov 20, 2002
No. 4D01-109
Reporters:
, ,
Before:
Shahood
SHAHOOD, J.

We affirm appellant, Lou Joseph’s, conviction and sentence for ‍‌​‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌​​‌​​​​​‌‌​​‌​​​​​​​‌‌​​‌‌​​‌​‌​​​​‌​‌‌‌​​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌​‌​‌​​​​‌‌‌‌‌​‌​​‌‌​‌‌​‍burglary of an occupied dwelling. Appellant argues on appeal that the evidence presented was insufficient to prove beyond a reasonable ‍‌​‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌​​‌​​​​​‌‌​​‌​​​​​​​‌‌​​‌‌​​‌​‌​​​​‌​‌‌‌​​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌​‌​‌​​​​‌‌‌‌‌​‌​​‌‌​‌‌​‍doubt, that appellant was guilty of burglary of an occupied dwelling and his motion for judgment of acquittal should ‍‌​‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌​​‌​​​​​‌‌​​‌​​​​​​​‌‌​​‌‌​​‌​‌​​​​‌​‌‌‌​​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌​‌​‌​​​​‌‌‌‌‌​‌​​‌‌​‌‌​‍have been granted. This argument made on appeal was not preserved in the trial court and cannot be raised ‍‌​‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌​​‌​​​​​‌‌​​‌​​​​​​​‌‌​​‌‌​​‌​‌​​​​‌​‌‌‌​​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌​‌​‌​​​​‌‌‌‌‌​‌​​‌‌​‌‌​‍for the first time on appeal. See F.B. v. State, 816 So.2d 699 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002)(citing State v. Barber, 301 So.2d 7 (Fla.1974)). We affirm ‍‌​‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌​​‌​​​​​‌‌​​‌​​​​​​​‌‌​​‌‌​​‌​‌​​​​‌​‌‌‌​​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌​‌​‌​​​​‌‌‌‌‌​‌​​‌‌​‌‌​‍all other issues raised without comment.

AFFIRMED.

STEVENSON and HAZOURI, JJ„ concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Joseph v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Nov 20, 2002
Citations: 830 So. 2d 911; 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 17159; 2002 WL 31557309; No. 4D01-109
Docket Number: No. 4D01-109
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
Log In