History
  • No items yet
midpage
Joseph Crussiah v. Carol Attia
16-1967
| 4th Cir. | Feb 2, 2017
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joseph Crussiah, Appellant Pro Se. Kristen Nichole Nesbitt, Lucas William Chrencik, GOODELL DEVRIES LEECH & DANN, LLP, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. *2 PER CURIAM:

Joseph Crussiah appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Crussiah v. Attia, No. 8:15-cv-02516-PX (D. Md. July 26, 2016). We deny Crussiah’s motion for judicial notice and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Case Details

Case Name: Joseph Crussiah v. Carol Attia
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Feb 2, 2017
Docket Number: 16-1967
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.