midpage

Jordan v. StateJordan v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
Oct 8, 1998
No. 92702
Versions:720 So. 2d 1077
23 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 535
1998 Fla. LEXIS 1900
1998 WL 696965

Lead Opinion

SHAW, Judge.

We have for review Jordan v. State, 707 So.2d 816 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998), wherein the district court cited for support Mays v. State, 693 So.2d 52 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997), which was pending in this Court. We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.

We have since approved the district court decision in Mays. See Mays v. State, 717 So.2d 515 (Fla.1998) (holding that under section 921.001(5), Florida Statutes (1995), if the “true” recommended guidelines sentence exceeds the statutory maximum, the guidelines sentence must be imposed). Accordingly, we approve the result in Jordan on this issue.1

It is so ordered.

HARDING, C.J., and OVERTON and WELLS, JJ., concur. PARIENTE, J., concurs in part and dissents in part with an opinion, in which KO-GAN and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur.

Notes

. We decline to address the other issues raised by Jordan since they were not the basis for our review.






Concurrence in Part

PARIENTE, Judge,

concurring in part and dissenting in part.

I concur in part and dissent in part for the reasons stated in my opinion in Mays v. State, 717 So.2d 515, 516-19 (Fla.1998) (Par-iente, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part).

KOGAN and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Jordan v. State
Court Name: Supreme Court of Florida
Date Published: Oct 8, 1998
Citations: 720 So. 2d 1077; 23 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 535; 1998 Fla. LEXIS 1900; 1998 WL 696965; No. 92702
Docket Number: No. 92702
Court Abbreviation: Fla.
Log In