Jordan v. StateJordan v. State
Petitioner was brought to trial on a charge of resisting arrest with violence pursuant to
Petitioner contends that Achin turns on the “invited error” doctrine, in that Achin‘s counsel had requested the defective instruction. In State v. Sykes, 434 So.2d 325 (Fla. 1983), we disposed of that contention and reached the same result as Achin. Sykes and Achin control the case at bar, and this district court has reached the result those decisions mandate.
Therefore, the decision of the district court is approved and this cause is remanded for a new trial.
It is so ordered.
ALDERMAN, C.J., and ADKINS, BOYD, OVERTON, McDONALD and SHAW, JJ., concur.