Jordan v. StateJordan v. State
Calvin Jordan was indicted for the unlawful distribution of a controlled substance in violation of
Initially, Jordan contends that the trial court committed reversible error in the sentencing phase by basing Jordan‘s sentence upon Jordan‘s alleged sale of controlled substances in a prior case in which there
It is axiomatic that to preserve an assignment of error for appellate review, the alleged error must first be presented to the trial court. Dossey v. State, 489 So. 2d 662 (Ala.Cr.App.), cert. denied, 489 So. 2d 662 (Ala. 1986). In the present case, Jordan did not object to his sentence at the sentencing hearing, nor did he file a motion for reconsideration based upon the court‘s consideration of allegedly improper facts at the sentencing hearing. Jordan, moreover, never raised the issue of the allegedly void indictment at any time during the proceedings below. Consequently, because these issues were not raised below, they have not been preserved for review at this time.
The foregoing opinion was prepared by the Honorable JAMES H. FAULKNER, a retired Supreme Court Justice, and his opinion is hereby adopted as that of the court.
The judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.
AFFIRMED.
All the Judges concur.