50 Ala. 493 | Ala. | 1874
The appellant sued the appellees, in detinue, for the recovery of a watch, the property of his intestate. The latter became possessed of it under the following circumstances : Immediately after the intestate’s death, Hughes
The pledge, or bailment of the watch, was made without authority, and, consequently, transferred no interest in it to the defendants. If the plaintiff participated in it, he cannot recover the watch, without paying the money for which it was pledged. If he did not, he may. 1 Williams on Ex’rs, 334, 527; Whitehall v. Squire, 1 Salk. 295. As he was not administrator at the time, his mere presence and passive. assent to the transaction is not sufficient to defeat his suit. He must be shown to have been a party to it. There was more of conflict in the testimony than authorized the charge of the court.
The judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded.