Jones v. Whitney

11 Mass. 74 | Mass. | 1814

Per Curiam.

In this case the two notes form together one usurious contract. The statute avoids them both.

Judgment on the verdict. ⁽²⁾, ^(a)

(2) Vide Cro. Jac. 508, Roberts vs. Trenayne.

(a) Maine Bank vs. Butts, 9 Mass. Rep. 49. — Bridge & Al. vs. Hubbard, 15 Mass Rep. 96.— Wickes vs. Gogerly, 2 Car. & P. 397, 1 R. & M. 123. —Preston vs. Jackson 2 Stark. 237.—Pickering vs. Banks, Forrest, 72.