187 Ky. 700 | Ky. Ct. App. | 1920
Opinion of the Court by
Affirming.
Plaintiff and defendant are adjoining landowners and the solution of the case depends on the proper location of the division line. On this question of fact considerable evidence was heard, which we deem it unnecessary to detail. It is sufficient to say that there are many facts and circumstances tending to uphold the contention of each of the parties. It is our rule not to disturb the finding of the chancellor upon a question of fact where the evidence is conflicting, and upon consideration of the whole case the mind is left in such doubt that we cannot say with reasonable certainty that the chancellor erred in his conclusion. Hayes v. Hayes’ Exor., 181 Ky. 589, 205 S. W. 596; Alexander v. Lewis, 184 Ky. 679, 212 S. W. 440. And this rule is particularly applicable to the facts of this case. Judgment affirmed.