History
  • No items yet
midpage
Jones v. . Swepson
79 N.C. 510
N.C.
1878
Check Treatment

This is an application to the Judge below to vacate a judgment under C. C. P., sec. 133, for excusable neglect. As the affidavit of the defendant is contradicted in some material particulars by the affidavit of the plaintiff, it was the duty of the Judge to find and set forth upon the record the facts upon which he grounded his judgment. Whether a given state of facts constitutes excusable neglect is a question of law. This Court has no jurisdiction to find the facts from the testimony contained in the affidavits when they (511) are conflicting. That is the peculiar province of the Court below. This is as well settled as any proposition can be, by many concurring decisions of this Court. Clegg v. Soap Stone Co., 66 N.C. 391; Hudgins v.White, 65 N.C. 393; Powell v. Weith, 66 N.C. 423.

Reversed.

Cited: Ashby v. Page, 108 N.C. 8; Finlayson v. Accident Co.,109 N.C. 199. *Page 382

Case Details

Case Name: Jones v. . Swepson
Court Name: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date Published: Jun 5, 1878
Citation: 79 N.C. 510
Court Abbreviation: N.C.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.