History
  • No items yet
midpage
Jones v. State
30 Ga. App. 13
| Ga. Ct. App. | 1923
|
Check Treatment
Luke, J.

The sole assignment of error is upon the ground that the evidence did not authorize the defendant’s conviction. Upon conflicting evidence the jury were authorized to return the verdict of guilty. The verdict having the approval of the trial judge, this court cannot say that it was error to overrule the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur. Len K. Roan, for plaintiff in error. John A. Boykin, solicitor-general, B. A. Stephens, contra.

Case Details

Case Name: Jones v. State
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Date Published: Mar 6, 1923
Citation: 30 Ga. App. 13
Docket Number: 14072
Court Abbreviation: Ga. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.