History
  • No items yet
midpage
Jones v. Rodman
4 Blackf. 492
Ind.
1838
Check Treatment

TWO days after the rendition of a judgment by a justice in favour of the plaintiff, the defendant obtained a new trial. On the day fixed for the new trial, the parties appeared, and the plaintiff obtained a continuance on account of the absence of witnesses whom he had subpoenaed, making no objection to the previous proceedings. On the day to which the cause was continued, the parties appeared and the cause was tried, the previous proceedings not being objected to. Verdict and judgment for the plaintiff. The defendant appealed. Held, that the plaintiff’s affidavit that the justice’s first judgment was rendered in the plaintiff’s absence, and that the new trial *493was applied for and granted without his knowledge, was not a sufficient ground, under the circumstances, for dismissing appeal.

Case Details

Case Name: Jones v. Rodman
Court Name: Indiana Supreme Court
Date Published: May 30, 1838
Citation: 4 Blackf. 492
Court Abbreviation: Ind.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.