Jones v. Quaker City Cab Co.
84 Pa. Super. 80 | Pa. Super. Ct. | 1924
Argued October 17, 1924. The only complaint is that the court below refused a new trial. At the oral argument in this court, counsel for appellant frankly stated that he was unable to show *83 any abuse of discretion, contending, however, that this court should examine the evidence de novo; the rule is otherwise; his concession leaves nothing for our consideration; if the only complaint is that the court refused a new trial, this court will not interfere unless abuse of discretion is shown.
The judgment is affirmed.