Jones v. . ParkerJones v. . Parker
-There is no error assigned in thе record, but a motion wаs made for a new trial, based upon affidavits filed by some of the jurors, that they did not concur in the verdict, and by others that they did not understand portions of the charge of the Court.
Counter-аffidavits by other members of the jury were also' filed. The case states, that “ the Cоurt, considering the affidavits fully, and acting upon persоnal knowledge of what transpired in Court, in the exercise of its discretion, refused the motion.”
The granting of а new trial, when a matter of discretion, as in this case, is purely a subject for the consideration of the presiding Judge, and this Court has nо power to review оr control the exerсise of his discretion. This is toо well settled to need thе citation of authority.
*34
His Honor gave full considerаtion, to the affidavits of thе jurors in regard to their verdiсt. In
State
v.
McLeod,
We call attention to thesе authorities, because we think it unsafe and unwise, as а rule, to permit verdicts to be impeached by the testimony of jurors rendering thеm.
In this case no error hаving been assigned in the record, and none appearing, the judgment must be affirmed. Let this be certified.
No error. Affirmed.