In a medical malpractice action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kangs County (Spodek, J.), dated December 28, 2001, which denied their motion to strike a second amended bill of particulars, granted the plaintiffs cross motion for leave to serve the second amended bill of particulars, and, sua sponte, vacated the note of issue.
Ordered that on the Court’s own motion, so much of the no
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in granting the plaintiff leave to serve a second amended bill of particulars. Leave to amend a bill of particulars is ordinarily freely given in the absence of prejudice or surprise resulting directly from the delay (see CPLR 3025 [b]; McCaskey, Davies & Assoc. v New York City Health & Hosps. Corp.,
Moreover, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in vacating the note of issue upon its own motion (see 202 NYCRR 202.21 [e]; Basetti v Nour,
