History
  • No items yet
midpage
Jones v. L'Ecluse
118 N.Y.S. 1116
N.Y. App. Div.
1909
Check Treatment

The order sets aside a verdict for the alleged misconduct of a juror. In a brief opinion the learned Special Term finds ho irregularity in the conduct of the j uryman, and also finds the conduct of the counsel and the witness involved to have been blameless, but holds that “ the influence of just such happenings is so subtle that it is most difficult to weigh its effect." We think a judgment should not be destroyed unless the alien influence is manifest, and, therefore, reverse the order, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and reinstate the verdict. Hirschberg, P. J., Gaynor and Rich, JJ., concurred; Burr and Miller, JJ., dissented.

Case Details

Case Name: Jones v. L'Ecluse
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Oct 15, 1909
Citation: 118 N.Y.S. 1116
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.