Jones v. Jones
624 So. 2d 263
Fla.
1993
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

We review Jones v. Jones, 606 So.2d 748 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992), based on conflict of decisions. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. We recently resolved the conflict in Mize v. Mize, 621 So.2d 417 (Fla.1993). On the authority of Mize, we quash the decision of the district court of appeal; we remand the case to that court for reconsideration in light of our opinion in Mize.

It is so ordered.

BARKETT, C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, shaw, grimes, kogan and HARDING, JJ., concur.