History
  • No items yet
midpage
Jones v. Jones
4 Va. 447
New York Court of Chancery
1809
Check Treatment
By the Chancellor.

As to the first question, the general rule of law is this, that where you take an account of one of the parties as evidence against him, you must admit it to be evidence for him : but this is only so far as the account itself would be evidence if it were proved by other means. For example, the account should not be evidence, so far as any error should be apparent on its face.

As to the second question: if the defendant had brought this suit, the judgment at law against him would be a clear bar; but as the suit is brought against him by his adversary, at law, the judgment is no bar.

Decree for the defendant.

Case Details

Case Name: Jones v. Jones
Court Name: New York Court of Chancery
Date Published: Jun 15, 1809
Citation: 4 Va. 447
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.