History
  • No items yet
midpage
Jones v. Harmon
8 Ohio Law. Abs. 321
Ohio Ct. App.
1930
Check Treatment

*322Marshall, CJ., Kinkade, Robinson and Matthias, JJ., concur. Jones and Day, JJ., concur in the syllabus but not in the judgment, since they do not agree with the law pronounced in Heidle v. Baldwin, 118 Ohio St., 375.

Case Details

Case Name: Jones v. Harmon
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: May 14, 1930
Citation: 8 Ohio Law. Abs. 321
Docket Number: No 22155
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.