94 N.Y.S. 57 | N.Y. App. Div. | 1905
Two warrants of attachment have been issued against the property of defendant Davis. The first of these was obtained on the 24th day of August, 1904, and was vacated because^ the plaintiff failed to produce an adequate surety. It likewisé appears that there was some question about the proper service of the papers under an Order, but this is not material to the determination of this appeal.
A second attachment was procured on the 2d day of December, 1904, but no service or order of publication was procured up to .January 3, 1905, on which date an order was entered extending the time to serve • the summons twenty days, and on the 23d day of January, 1905, publication was begun and continued the required time. At Special Term the warrant of attachment has been set aside and the plaintiff appeals.
The order appealed from should be affirmed, with costs.
Bartlett, Rich and Miller, JJ., concurred.
Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.
Laws of 1892, chap. 677, § 24, as amd. by Laws of 1902, chap. 39.— [Rep.