1 Neb. 170 | Neb. | 1871
It is not usual for courts to disturb the verdict of a jury because it is against the weight of evidence, where there is any evidence to support it. We see no occasion to do so in this case.
The action was brought in the District Court by J ones against Edwards, to recover damages, because of fraud practiced in the sale of a horse. The defendant, with the cunning not unfrequently intro dued into this class of transactions, seems to have provided against much evidence being brought against him. Still, enough appears to warrant the verdict.
In the November previous to the sale, Edwards traded for the horse. He was then afflicted with sweany, stiffness of the neck, and other ailments. Edwards cut some cords about the nose and neck, and turned the horse out in the yard, relieved from work. In March, Jones came along
The judgment, although somewhat informal, is good, and must stand.
Judgment affirmed.