History
  • No items yet
midpage
17 Ga. App. 726
Ga. Ct. App.
1916
Wade, J.

1. Although motions for new trials based on newly discovered evidence are not favored by the courts, a new trial should be granted if the conviction of the accused rests upon circumstantial evidence alone, and the newly discovered evidence is direct and positive in character as to the innocence of the defendant, and such testimony would, if the witness be credited, produce a different result on a second trial. See Dougherty v. State, 7 Ga. App. 91 (66 S. E. 276).

2. The motion for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence met all the requirements of law; it does not appear that the alleged newly discovered testimony could have been obtained at the trial by the exercise of reasonable diligence, and the ends of justice require that a new trial be granted.

Judgment reversed.

Russell, C. J., absent. Hal B. Wimberly, for plaintiff in error. 8. P. New, solicitor, contra.

Case Details

Case Name: Joiner v. State
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Date Published: Mar 16, 1916
Citations: 17 Ga. App. 726; 88 S.E. 215; 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 882; 7112
Docket Number: 7112
Court Abbreviation: Ga. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified
and are not legal advice.
Log In