Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concurred, except Kruse, J., who dissented upon the ground that the evidence shows that it was the duty of the deceased to make such an inspection as the court charged would make the deceased guilty of contributory negligence if he had made such inspection and failed to discover the defect.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.
