midpage

Johnston v. RobinsJohnston v. Robins

New York Supreme Court
Aug 15, 1808
Reporters:
Per Curiam.

It was decided in the case of Jackson, ex dem. Griffiths, (4 Term Rep. 465.) that in every case ‍‌‌​‌‌​​‌​‌​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌​‌​​‌‌‌​‌​‌​​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​​​​‌​​​‌​​‌​‌‌​​​‌​​‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌​​‌​​‍of the service of a notice, leaving it at the dw.elling-house of the party, was to be considered as a personal service, for every purpose, except to ‍‌‌​‌‌​​‌​‌​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌​‌​​‌‌‌​‌​‌​​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​​​​‌​​​‌​​‌​‌‌​​​‌​​‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌​​‌​​‍bring the party into contempt. We consider the declaration as having been personally served on the defendant, on the lpth May, and that the defendant was bound to plead ‍‌‌​‌‌​​‌​‌​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌​‌​​‌‌‌​‌​‌​​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​​​​‌​​​‌​​‌​‌‌​​​‌​​‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌​​‌​​‍in 20 days thereafter. The default was, therefore, regularly entered; and the affidavits do not disclose equitable grounds sufficient to induce the court to interfere and ‍‌‌​‌‌​​‌​‌​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌​‌​​‌‌‌​‌​‌​​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​​​​‌​​​‌​​‌​‌‌​​​‌​​‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌​​‌​​‍set aside the default upon terms. The offer of the plaintiff to waive the default, was reasonable ; but the defendant chose to rest himself upon what ‍‌‌​‌‌​​‌​‌​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌​‌​​‌‌‌​‌​‌​​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​​​​‌​​​‌​​‌​‌‌​​​‌​​‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌​​‌​​‍he conceived to be the rule of practice as to the-service of notices.

Rule refused.

Case Details

Case Name: Johnston v. Robins
Court Name: New York Supreme Court
Date Published: Aug 15, 1808
Citation: 3 Johns. 440
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. Sup. Ct.
Log In