Johnson v. WhiteJohnson v. White
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
Contrary to the plaintiff‘s contention, the Supreme Court properly permitted the issue of intoxication to be raised at trial. The evidence of the plaintiff‘s intoxication consisted of a police officer‘s personal observations of the plaintiff about an hour before the subject accident and testimony by the plaintiff‘s companion as to drinks the plaintiff consumed in the hours leading up to the accident. Such evidence was relevant to the
The Supreme Court properly denied that branch of the plaintiff‘s motion which was pursuant to
The plaintiff‘s remaining contention with respect to the jury charge is without merit.
Mastro, J.P., Florio, Belen and Chambers, JJ., concur.