Johnson v. WareJohnson v. Ware
Nov 18, 1910
- Reporters:
- , ,
- Before:
- Atkinson
Atkinson, J.
November 18, 1910.
Action, for penalty. Before Judge Littlejohn. Stewart superior court. December 27, 1909.
W. H. Gurr and E. T. Hickey, for plaintiff in error.
1. A ground of a motion for new trial which complains of a ruling under which certain evidence was., admitted, But which fails to disclose what objection, if any, was interposed to its admissibility at *366tlie time it was offered, can not be considered. Smith v. Smith, 133 Ga. 170 (3) (65 S. E. 414).
2. An attack upon a statute as unconstitutional, made for the first time in the brief of counsel in the Supreme Court, will not be considered. In this connection see Savannah, Florida & Western Ry. Co. v. Hardin, 110 Ga. 433 (35 S. E. 681).
3. The evidence was conflicting, but sufficient to support the verdict; and there was no error in refusing to grant a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
All the Justices concur.’