7 Ohio 62 | Ohio | 1836
delivered the opinion of the court:
It is admitted by all that a discretionary power vested in the court to settle controversies of this nature in the manner proposed by this motion, would very greatly add to.the probability of doing;
The difficulties arising in cases of this kind, however, may be avoided by a resort to a court of equity, which has concurrent jurisdiction with the courts of law in cases of this description. Those long and perplexing accounts might then be referred to a •competent master, and be far more satisfactorily adjusted.
Motion refused at defendants’ costs, and case remanded.