The circuit judge, we think, was correct in holding that the letter of the plaintiffs of September 20, was not an unconditional acceptance of the defendant’s offer, and consequently no contract was effected.
Judgment affirmed, with costs.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.
