Johnson v. StateJohnson v. State
The defendant appeals the revocation of his probation. Held:
1. The condition the defendant was charged with violating was one which provided for a “10:00 P.M. to 6:00 A.M. Curfew.”
This court and our Supreme Court have often held that Code Ann. § 27-2711 (Ga. L. 1958, pp. 15, 23; as amended through Ga. L. 1965, pp. 413, 416) is to be construed as permissive rather than exclusive, permitting under its terms any reasqnable probation condition to be imposed.
George v. State,
2. From an examination of the record and transcript it is apparent that there is some evidence sufficient to sustain the trial
Judgment affirmed.