History
  • No items yet
midpage
Johnson v. Star Permanent Wave Corp.
237 A.D. 868
N.Y. App. Div.
1932
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

Plaintiff received from defendant a hair treatment known as a “ permanent wave.” In consideration of a reduced rate charged for the work plaintiff signed a document reading as follows: “ In consideration of the reduced rates given to me by the Star Permanent Wave Corporation of the City of Syracuse, I hereby release and agree to save harmless the Star Permanent Wave Corporation from any and all liability which might arise as a result of any injuries received for any reason while receiving a permanent wave.” The signing was voluntary, no fraud having been practiced by defendant in connection with the transaction. Plaintiff has recovered a judgment for $351 for burns received. The judgment should be reversed and the complaint dismissed, with costs in all courts, the document quoted being a complete bar to any cause of action in favor of plaintiff. (Anderson v. Erie R. R. Co., 223 N. Y. 277.) Under the circumstances presented the fact that plaintiff did not read the document is immaterial. (Metzger v. Ætna Ins. Co., 227 N. Y. 411, 415, 416.) All concur. Judgment reversed on the law and complaint dismissed, with costs in all courts.

Case Details

Case Name: Johnson v. Star Permanent Wave Corp.
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Dec 15, 1932
Citation: 237 A.D. 868
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.