2 Shan. Cas. 62 | Tenn. | 1876
delivered the opinion of the court:
The chancellor erred in dismissing the petition of Dan
If these facts be true, the petitioner should not have been dispossessed under the writ of possession, and the chancellor should have ascertained the facts, and if found to be true, should at once have restored the petitioner to the possession.
And to this "end the decree is reversed and the cause remanded, the complainants paying the costs of this court.