History
  • No items yet
midpage
Johnson v. Rand
6 N.H. 22
Superior Court of New Hampshir...
1832
Check Treatment
By the court.

The only question which this case presents, is, whether the defendant had a right to change the mode, in which he used the water, for the purposes of his mill, provided he took no more water than was necessary to work the mill, before he made the changes r This question has long been settled, and we think that the direction, to the jury, was as favorable to the plaintiffs, as the law will warrant. 1 B. & A. 258, Saunders v. Newman; 2 N. H. Rep. 255, Bullen v. Runnels; 4 Coke, 86, Luttrel's case; 5 Taunton, 454, Alder v. Lavil.

Judgment on the verdict.

Case Details

Case Name: Johnson v. Rand
Court Name: Superior Court of New Hampshire
Date Published: May 15, 1832
Citation: 6 N.H. 22
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.