155 P. 375 | Or. | 1916
delivered the opinion of the court.
*410 “We ask the court to instruct the jury that stepping from a slowly moving street-car is not negligence as a matter of law.”
This was refused, and plaintiff’s counsel reserved an exception. This requested instruction would be likely to be understood by the jury as a declaration that in any event such an act would not he negligence. The jury ought not to be required to make nice technical distinctions. The request was not in proper form for the jury to understand, and the trial court should not be required during the closing moments of a trial to frame instructions. There was no error in the refusal.
Finding no error in the record, the judgment of the lower court is affirmed. Affirmed.