History
  • No items yet
midpage
Johnson v. McDonald
39 P.2d 150
Okla.
1934
Check Treatment
ANDREWS, J.

The plaintiff brought this action against the defendants to recover a judgment for an alleged balance on a promissory note. The defense was misrepresentation and fraud in the inducement leading up to the execution thereof, The cause was tried to the court. Judgment was rendered for the defendants, and the plaintiff appealed.

The questions presented to this court for determination are: Was fraud sufficiently alleged and proven, and was there a sufficient restoration or offer to restore? Those were questions of fact upon which the court passed, and there being competent evidence *118 reasonably tending to sustain tbe judgment of tbe trial court in a law action tried without a jury, the judgment must be and is affirmed.

RILEY, C. J., and SWINDALL, McNEILL, OSBORN, andJBAYLESS, JJ., concur. CULLISON, Y. O. J., and BUSBY and WELCH, JJ., absent.

Case Details

Case Name: Johnson v. McDonald
Court Name: Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Date Published: Dec 18, 1934
Citation: 39 P.2d 150
Docket Number: 21895
Court Abbreviation: Okla.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.